Submissions for Season 6 are now closed. 

How Judging Works

Evaluated by practitioners. Governed by process.
Designed to find genuine excellence.

South Africa's marketing leaders

Not theorists. Practitioners who've solved the same problems you're submitting entries about.

Who Judges

  • 75+

    Leading industry professionals

    CMOs, senior brand strategists, and agency principals. They know what good looks like - and what mediocre dressed up as good looks like too.

    Judges to be announced soon...

  • 25

    Strategic Council members

    Senior industry leaders who govern the judging framework, manage escalations, and ensure standards remain uncompromised season on season.

    Meet the Council →]
  • Evaluation criteria

    What judges evaluate

    Every entry is scored across three dimensions. The weighting is deliberate: strategy matters most.

  • 50

    points

    Strategy

    Business context, insight quality, and the logic of your approach.

  • 25

    points

    Execution

    Quality and consistency of implementation against the strategy.

  • 25

    points

    Results & Learnings

    Business impact, measurement rigour, and attribution of outcomes.

  • Section D: Code, Culture & Commerce (C³) - not scored

    This section captures how your marketing initiative engaged with the three forces of C³. Responses are not scored but contribute to the MAA Industry Intelligence Benchmark Report - a sector-wide view of how South African marketing is navigating Code, Culture, and Commerce. Complete it thoroughly.

    The process

    Three phases. Rigorous by design.

    Thorough. Deliberate. Consistent

    1

    Online Judging

    June - August

    Individual scoring and commentary by assigned judges.

    2

    Calibration

    August

    Scoring consistency verified across all categories.

    3

    Final Adjudication

    August - September

    Top entries reviewed in person by the full panel to decide on winners.

    All entrants receive basic scoring feedback on request. Winners receive full judge commentary and a citation as part of their recognition.

    Integrity

    How we protect integrity

    All judges sign a comprehensive NDA covering entries and deliberations.

    No AI tools are permitted in evaluation. Human judgement only.

    Category assignments are managed to avoid conflicts of interest. We research backgrounds, relationships, and competitive landscapes before assigning judges.

    Judges score independently before panel discussion. Individual assessment before any group deliberation.

    Sensitive material can be marked [CONFIDENTIAL]. Your intellectual property remains yours.